Overview

---

Convert an image containing a formula to corresponding LaTeX code.

---

Here are some examples that demonstrate the performance of the model:

\nabla\times{\vec{\mathbf{B}}} - {\frac{1}{C}} {\frac{\delta{\vec{\mathbf{E}}}}{\delta t}}=4\pi\rho

\ln f_{a,\sigma^{2}}(\xi_{1})_{=} \frac{(\xi_{1} - a)}{\sigma^{2}}

H(Y|X)=\sum_{x\in{\mathcal{X}},y\in{\mathcal{Y}}}p(x,y) \log\left({\frac{p(x)}{p(x,y)}}\right)

\rho\left({\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}}+v\cdot\nabla v\right)=-\nabla p+\nabla\cdot T+f

\sigma=\frac{\pi\alpha^{2}\beta^{3}}{3s}\left[1 + \frac{s( - 1 + 4s_{W}^{2})}{2c_{W}^{2}(s - M_{Z}^{2})} + \frac{s^{2}( - 1 + 4s_{W}^{2} + 8s_{W}^{4})}{4c_{W}^{4}(s - M_{Z}^{2})^{2}}\right]\;,

\begin{array}{l}{{\mathrm{d}C= - v(r)r{\mathrm{d}}\varphi + v(r + {\mathrm{d}}r)\cdot(r + {\mathrm{d}}r){\mathrm{d}}\varphi}} \\ {{\mathrm{~}= - v(r)r{\mathrm{d}}\varphi + \left(v(r) + {\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}}{\mathrm{d}}r\right)(r + {\mathrm{d}}r){\mathrm{d}}\varphi}} \\ {{\mathrm{~}}} \\ {{\mathrm{~}=v(r){\mathrm{d}}r{\mathrm{~}}\varphi + {\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}}r{\mathrm{d}}r{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{~}}{\mathrm{~}}\varphi + {\mathrm{O}}({\mathrm{d}}^{3})}}\end{array}

\begin{array}{c c}{{\bar{u}_{s}(\vec{p})\cdot u_{r}(\vec{p}) = 2m\delta_{s r},}} & {{\qquad u_{s}^{\dagger}(\vec{p})\cdot u_{r}(\vec{p}) = 2p^{0}\delta_{s r},}}\\ {{\bar{v}_{s}(\vec{p})\cdot v_{r}(\vec{p}) = -2m\delta_{s r},}} & {{\qquad v_{s}^{\dagger}(\vec{p})\cdot v_{r}(-\vec{p}) = 2p^{0}\delta_{s r},}}\\ {{\bar{u}_{s}(\vec{p})\cdot v_{r}(\vec{p}) = 0,}} & {{u_{s}^{\dagger}(\vec{p})\cdot v_{r}(-\vec{p}) = 0,}}\end{array}

The result of second,sixth and seventh figures in the compiles,the predicted code is close to the original;others code generates the same image;there are no any significant differences between the original and the predicted code.